Apple’s App Review Fix Fails to Placate Developers
wired.com
wired.com
This is a huge problem. Not only are reviewers rushed ("reviewers often have only minutes to review each app"), but they're not even competent to do their jobs in the first place. As an App Store developer, it's frustrating to me, because it's obvious that reviewers often don't have a clue. I have to explain the most basic things to clear up misunderstandings.
This is also why scams can so easily get through. Reviewers are no more sophisticated than the App Store customers who fall for the scams.
What I find most curious about the ultra-secretive Apple is that they're willing to admit they have only 500 total reviewers for all the millions of apps and updates. It's just an insane ratio.
One of the dumbest reasons I saw for being rejected was that our app's "invite a user by email" functionality (which only sends an email, nothing more) was mistaken for account creation and they wanted a cut of revenue.
Unlike law, you don’t get direct access to this precedent as an App Store developer. Nor is it easy to actually invoke it when you are aware it exists. Calling out a reviewer when they fail to interpret a vague guideline in line with what Apple actually wants it to mean (which you have to do the hard work of understanding) is incredibly tedious and not guaranteed to show results. And if you don’t actually understand how the rules work, you’re basically stuck :(
I think I had to do about 5 rounds of submission. Some things they found were legit; but the biggest problem was the subjectivity and inconsistency: Sometimes a reviewer would find something that wasn't a problem, but the next reviewer would find something else that wasn't a problem.