Honestly these are my favorite PRs to receive for my open source side projects. They are easy to review and approve. The smaller the PR the less time consuming it is for me to deal with them. Big PRs that add complex new features are also appreciated of course. But setting apart time to review them is often hard given other responsibilities that I have. And often I personally don't even need the feature that's being added.

Honestly this is baffling to me — who doesn't appreciate PRs fixing typos? Does even the parent commenter agree with this, assuming they're actual typos?

I both try and make these PRs, and appreciate others doing it! That's how things get better.

This is insane.

What makes things worse for everyone is little documentation cobbled together in 5min like the homework of a teen just before class.

Your genius code is useless in isolation.

I think that's the sort of thing which should be tacked onto other, more substantial changes.

"By the way, I also fixed a few typos in the documentation" is much better than making that your ONLY change.