Censorship is different from email spam filters and antivirus software because the recipient can choose to bypass the latter for individual emails or files if they want to. And that ability is important, since both have false positives a lot.
ISPs are not police, elected representatives or courts; they shouldn't be allowed to usurp that role.
Think about trans people as a demographic for a second.
We have very little economic power or numbers worth mobilizing for votes. Absolutely nobody has any interest in lobbying for us, corporations posturing to appeal to idealistic liberals (and then doing nothing) aside.
The only resemblance of institutional power trans people have is to appeal to those that have the actual power.
No ISP is compelled to provide services to the likes of kiwi farms. If there are no laws, lobby to make them.
You have no right to force others to cater to your personal whims, specially if they are objectionable.
edit: I guess my disagreement with the idea of "forcing others" is primarily that I don't consider companies past a certain size worthy of having a right of free expression.
The only exception to this is very obvious malice. Everything else is more likely to get you fired if you complain to HR than them.
The law won’t work here. They don’t care about the law.
Whenever Kiwi Farms comes up, I see these claims made about it - that people were threatened with violence, that the forum was used to coordinate harassment campaigns, that home addresses were posted, etc etc - but never with any specific examples shown of any of that happening.
e.g. this FOIA request: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/fre...
The fact that twitch streamers still regularly get their addresses leaked despite taking appropriate measures shows how impossible of a standard this is.