Is it really better to create a world where said content cannot exist due to disabled people?

I am sure I would, however, removing content completely just because you cannot afford to backtrack over 1000s of hours of content to add this requirement is not good and many people with disabilities would agree with that. Why not simply say it only applies to businesses and only for content that was released online after the law came into existence. And then a grace period of 60 days or something. What is wrong with that?

So every single magazine out there needs to exist in braille so blind people can read them? If I publish stuff on the Internet, I'm the one choosing "how public" it is. It's nobody else's business.