> The GP comment is sort of misleading...you wouldn't just pick enzymes at random to do this analysis.
I said pick blind, not at random. I recommend reading https://info.umkc.edu/drbanderson/p-hacking-and-the-problem-...
I said pick blind, not at random. I recommend reading https://info.umkc.edu/drbanderson/p-hacking-and-the-problem-...
To fairly make a critique like that, you need to have at least some evidence that a selection bias was applied for no other reason than to affect the p-value. Otherwise, literally every study can be accused of "p-hacking". Here, there's a very good, obvious explanation for the choice that they made, and therefore all you can really say is that the results might be different if you looked at a different set of enzymes.