0: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3a4a612d75ed088ea542acac52f9f45987488d1c&dn=sd-v1-4.ckpt&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.opentrackr.org%3a1337
0: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3a4a612d75ed088ea542acac52f9f45987488d1c&dn=sd-v1-4.ckpt&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.opentrackr.org%3a1337
Seconded, actually. I do have a bad habit of assuming people already know this.
> Official sources are recommended for this reason.
Very not seconded; see for example comments elsewhere in this thread about untrustworthy sources for popcorn time, and recall that the GP was specifically discussing the risk of Stability AI deciding to kill this.
So a paywall. I agree it's a annoyingly misleading term for the concept and would be happy to hear better alternatives[0], but I haven't found one yet.
0: like eg "passphrase" instead of "password" or "assuming the conclusion" instead of "begging the question" for their respective concepts