> Ergonomics is ugly.
He casually pinned these three words like he pinned something to a cork board.
Making anything involves fitting constraints and prioritizing by some criteria. Ergonomics just means using human anatomy (capability, comfort, safety) as a deliberate constraint/criterion in tool design, instead of treating it as an afterthought (even when ignored, anatomy still has some kind of “veto” insofar as a tool can’t ever be entirely impossible to use).
Starting from first principles with human capabilities and comfort as an explicit goal results in more effective designs which extend tool users’ capabilities further.
I think it is incredibly beautiful to have tools shaped to match human bodies. After looking at a couple videos of these lovely ergonomic violas, every time I see a regular viola in the future I’m going to be seeing debilitating repetitive strain injuries.
I mean... That instrument can sound like it's made by Gods in Heavens, but it looks like one of those Dali semi-molten clocks that got turned into a violin and would subtly message "kILL mEeeEe" through any music played through it.
Aesthetics of musical instruments matter a lot, both to the performers and the audience.
Case in point, most people don't get an ergonomic mouse/keyboard until their hands start hurting.
The french horn is not exactly the paradigm of beauty. Or a player blowing into an oboe (it is difficult to imagine that gesture producing such a beautiful noise; does he need to make that face, really? Indeed, he does). The posture with the violin is one of the most awkward one could imagine, also.
When those violas are played (as seen in the videos), the shape is least visible.
No, it's because it is very asymmetric, and we prefer symmetric shapes to asymmetric ones.
>The french horn is not exactly the paradigm of beauty.
I disagree. The instrument has an aesthetic.
> Or a player blowing into an oboe
The instrument looks fine though.
>The posture with the violin is one of the most awkward one could imagine, also.
The posture with the cello is arguably a very sexy one, but if you ask a cellist and violinist to walk while playing the instrument, guess which one's going to be the awkward one.
The violin gained initial popularity among street musicians. This is why it has the ergonomics it does.
The violin posture allows the performer to walk and jump and dance while playing the instrument.
Have you seen performers like Lindsey Stirling? That would be the last showperson I'd call "awkwardly postured".
I've played a show once where we shared some instruments with another band due to cramped stage. The keyboardist in the other band was playing a Nord Stage, which is a very expensive, but still plastic keyboard (they go for $4-5K).
Despite its iconic look already being a thing that people shell out extra $$$ for ("gotta have the red one!"), the performer put hers in a grand piano shell.
That is, a gutted grand piano (or a mock-up), with the Nord Stage on the keybed.
Looks matter to performers.
The shorter neck on the instrument also means you don't have to hold your tuning hand out so far (a similar torque issue) and it also means moving your hand out of first position to play higher notes is a shorter motion.
edit: The viola is of course also thicker, which means maneuvering your tuning hand around it involves twisting your shoulder more. I imagine the unusual shape also improves that situation.
I used to play the viola da gamba (leg viola), which comes in all sizes but you play them kinda like little cellos. They have six strings, frets, and you hold the bow a little differently, but even the small ones are played with it tucked between your knees.
The modern viola is too small to resonate well in its note range, but it's a compromise we make to keep it looking like a violin.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violin_octet [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVVh-kNmRcA
Or just have cellists play them, instead of violinists. It seems Yo Yo Ma has played one without much difficulty!