He has the option to sue, but the way to gain respect is to demonstrate his ability in an environment that controls for any means of cheating posited by those who suspect him of doing so.
This is just an easy excuse.
"He cheated!" "There are anticheat measures" "They're not good enough"
It's a cycle that can never be solved. The loser can always claim the anticheat measures were "not enough".
You know what. I think Carlsen has cheated in every single one of his games. Prove the contrary.
Something might be placed inside the organism.
> I think Carlsen has cheated in every single one of his games. Prove the contrary.
That's easy. He streamed a lot of games with the tightest time requirements happening in the discipline, kind of 3 minutes per player plus extra 1 second per move. The speed of that game is so high that there is simply no time for having a conversations with cheating device. Also he always notice some suspicious moves (in not that fast games) which becomes correlating with chess engine.
https://www.chessdom.com/hans-niemann-was-thoroughly-checked...
Seems unlikely ...
Conversations? A cheating software can read the board and even move the pieces for him, this is ridiculous. 100% a cheater.
As far as I am concerned, once Niemann has passed all the tests his accusers can come up with, he would be vindicated, and they would be subject to opprobrium - it would be a vindication unavailable even through a successful libel suit. There's no infinite regress of suspicion in this view.
https://www.chessdom.com/hans-niemann-was-thoroughly-checked...
I don't know what else they could have done other than full body x-ray him. Make your own mind up whether these checks are stringent.
In addition, there was a 15 minute broadcast delay.
His record in that tournament for rounds 4 though 9 was loss, draw, draw, win, draw. Hans was the lowest rated player in the tournament by 57 points.
In any such proposal, he could reasonably require the same of his opponents and any monitors present.