The difference is they all went to the same schools together.
Makes close to zero difference who runs the country, because once you’ve lived under both sides it’s the same thing.
The difference is they all went to the same schools together.
Makes close to zero difference who runs the country, because once you’ve lived under both sides it’s the same thing.
Only Ed Milliband and Tony Blair went to Oxford, which is where (of the Conservative Party): David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Theresa May and Liz Truss went.
Saying "living under both sides is the same thing" is also observably false, as anyone raised under the Labour governments of 1997 to 2010 can attest and compare to the Conservative governments since.
edit: oh lol I get it now, in the post I replied to you're doing a very literal interpretation of "they all went to the same schools" and refusing to interpret this as it's very clearly intended (that a huge amount of MPs went to a couple of schools)
30% of our House went to a top 100 university which isn't necessarily saying much - that list includes many state universities and I'd say that's a perfectly appropriate number.
20% of the British Parliament went to Oxbridge alone.
//edit// ..and had a privileged upbringing, so was the same class as the others.
He went to neither Eton nor Oxford so no, he didn't go to the same schools as the Conservative leaders he faced.
Starmer went to Oxford. "gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree at St Edmund Hall at the University of Oxford in 1986."
In the past 50 years there have only been 3 PMs not from Oxford. It has nothing to do with conservatives or labor.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_t...
I think it's time to look in the mirror and see that your preconceptions and biases are making you overlook reality. Like.. obvious reality. Reality that's so obvious it's in Wikipedia info boxes.
There's a number of components to the sentence I responded to:
> same schools
and
> together
An undergrad studying PPE and postgrad studying Law are not "going to Oxford together." Instead of trying to uncover some insidious bias on my end, I'd strongly recommend doing more than a surface level scan of Wikipedia pages to "win the argument," so to speak.
Honestly, the problem isn't even with all Oxford undergraduate degrees, just a slice of PPE and adjacent students who are vastly overrepresented in politics.
(My background: Leeds BA, Oxford MSc/DPhil. Don't like Starmer, though, despite our similar university choices...)
Ahh yeah the “WMD” Iraq war and introduction of University top up fees.