In South Korea, robots are on the job. How is the service?
expmag.com
expmag.com
This is the kind of stuff that makes robot/computer customer service bad. If you fall into the normal use case, it's fine, but if you need anything unusual or you make a mistake, the escape hatch is always to get a real human, so you've now wasted time.
On top of that, it's often much slower than human service. Lots of fast food restaurants have a ordering touchscreen kiosks now, there are some advantages, but ultimately it's a much slower experience because the interface is much less efficient than talking to a human who's using a dedicated piece of hardware that they're trained on.
Personally I prefer having the gaggle of kiosks because while it's slower, there's a few advantages:
* Fewer/shorter lines to begin ordering, due to the advantage in numbers described above
* Can take my time looking through everything, even with a more complex order, without social pressure of knowing I'm hindering everyone behind me
* Foreign language options when traveling
Of course, it's probably a good idea to have at least one human employee who can at least optionally handle orders in cases where the kiosk doesn't work.
Wash your hands before eating?
AND they should provide a way to just type in what you want to quickly filter it from a global list of items via fuzzy match.
i'm not even suggesting to incorporate NLP and speech recognition. we have self driving cars, reusable rockets, DALL-E, and GPT-3 in 2022 and still have to waste time manually entering a fast food order?
i know, it's rocket science.
an app to submit an order instead of a proper mobile site? no thanks, i dont need to swallow those twitter and facebook sdks, and god knows what else. the APK is 80MB :D
https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/mcdonalds-apps/mcdonalds-2/
EDIT: i just extracted it. spoiler: the overwhelming majority of it isn't image assets. it does contain QuickJS, though!
But downloading an app, or using a large display are probably better for sales.
It's called fast food for a reason. I spend more time waiting for my food than ordering. If there's a long line it means the restaurant is understaffed. I'd leave in that case.
* Can take my time looking through everything, ...
You can read the menu as long as you'd like before you get on the line to order. The waiter can always come back. I mean really...
* Foreign language options when traveling
France. I can see some larger chain restaurants having this feature but no mom and pop shop is going to need or care to translate their menu unless its a tourist destination. And even then it detracts from the native atmosphere and immersiveness. Besides, not many people travel as they don't have the money. (Though perhaps beneficial for immigrants)
No I can't, because lots of restaurants don't bother to put all possible options and their descriptions or even just a list of non-alcoholic beverages there. Wine cart is always there, but specifying a kind of tea seems like a big no-no. What kind of tea is that? Oh, some random bags which you can check in the kitchen in a few minutes? Do you have apple juice then? How large is it? Can you make it without ice? Maybe you have some other rarer drinks that I like? Can you remove pickles from the burger, even though there were none on the picture, but I've heard from the neighboring table that there are some?
An average kiosk answers all these questions because it _has to_ have buttons for these options. An average menu does not, it relies on me remembering all the possibilities and interacting with a waiter or a cashier.
And I'm not even talking fast-food restaurants where the menu is up at the top, only listing a tenth of the options with pictures, and the rest being written in a small font I'm unable to see without binoculars.
> An average kiosk answers all these questions because it _has to_ have buttons for these options.
So a restaurant which cant be bothered to list everything in a printed menu is going to list everything in a kiosk? Did you really type all this without thinking?
Correct, because in a printed menu you usually don't have things like "no pickles" or "extra onions" because it's assumed you'll tell an employee that vocally, whereas in a kiosk you obviously need to be able to do that in the interface.
In practice, this means that there can be 'hidden options' that people may not be aware of on a printed menu.
> Did you really type all this without thinking?
This was unnecessary.
Good for you? What even is the point of such a comment?
> You can read the menu as long as you'd like before you get on the line to order. The waiter can always come back. I mean really...
Waiter? What kind of places do you think we're talking about?
> I can see some larger chain restaurants having this feature but no mom and pop shop is going to need or care to translate their menu unless its a tourist destination.
Again with an utterly bizarre comment. As if chain restaurants just didn't matter at all, or machine translation software didn't exist?
> Besides, not many people travel as they don't have the money.
Talk about out of touch. At least before the pandemic, there was probably more world travel than there ever had been in history.
The same thing happens when a computer system which is being used by a human crashes. Or a human worker needs to diverge from the happy path in a slightly complicated way.
This seems to be more of a bad/incomplete implementation than a structural problem with robots/kiosks.
There's this misconception that everything needs to be autonomous all the time. Not only does this not need to be the case... sometimes it's distinctly better to build a system that can accommodate some remote human assistance -- whether that's flexibility, customer service, cultural, or even as a technology assist (e.g. to overcome "last mile" issues until the autonomy catches up). By building 95%-99.9%+ autonomous systems, you learn how to achieve 100% service operations, bootstrap new capabilities, and improve autonomy based on real-world experience.
I’d argue that the majority of users can’t be bothered to RTFM (and the “M” here is usually one sentence above the call to action) and just want someone to do it for them / hold their hand. These customers are a big drain for customer support and ironically make automated support appealing. Meanwhile the legit edge case becomes a casualty of this automation.
I get the human can probably handle this particular case, but it's not true for a lot of customer service problems.
On the article's anecdote, I'm pretty sure the robot didn't just literally "freeze" but show a message explaining that number is unknown and ask to retry with the right one. The customer couldn't understand the international prefix was missing, and kept reinputing the same thing again and again.
That kind of stuff will regularly happen with human being typing into the form for you, and telling you the system can't find your number. It's after the first or second try that they'll start debugging with you, checking if you changed you number or put your spouse's one, if it's foreign etc. That "traditional" flow doesn't seem too far from the experience the author had, except they perhaps tried 5 or 6 times instead of 2, because in their mind the robot must be dumb in that specific way and can totally react differently the 6th time.
I'd argue the robot setting is kind of the best of both worlds: customers in the happy path will fly through the system, and customers hitting the wall will have staff that are specially ready to work it out with the customer.
PS: even with a half-baked input system, customers who get used to it after the second or third time will still be faster than dealing with staff inputing their info for them. It's a clear advantage for repeaters.
Fast food restaurants employees are not faster at explaining the menu, or showing the payment options, scanning the membership card etc. IME you can't just dump a magic incantation at the cashier and have them remember it all while hitting the right buttons. Some might be capable of that, most are just part time students keeping their mental energy for the next day's lectures.
> Japan’s Henn na Hotel fires half its robot workforce
> Japan’s Henn na Hotel, which first opened in 2015 with a staff of robots, has cut its robotic workforce after the experience failed to reduce costs or workload for its employees.
> The hotel, which is located in Nagasaki, will reduce its 243-robotic workforce by more than half and return to more traditional human-provided services for guests, though it will maintain a number of robots in areas where it found them to be effective and efficient. Its change of direction can offer lessons for companies that are pursuing robotic solutions for customer-service roles, reports the Business Insider.
Where are the home-ground American and South Korean novelty robot hotels?
Today I dropped off a rental car and the employee just scanned a barcode on the windshield and said, "okay just put the keys on the dash, you're good to go". Such a huge improvement over what it used to be, years ago.
The mentioned ‘serving robots’ are just a table with wheels, nothing else. No reason for people to feel them as ‘companions’ or such. You just pick your menu in your tablet on the table, and when time passes, the food rolls over. This is not rocket science, people.
The mentioned ‘greeter robot’ is literally a tablet with wheels, and is useful because it doesn’t try to do anything clever; it’s really just a rolling kiosk, and people use them as such.
I mean, like come on. This isn’t anything headline worthy, especially not something to describe East Asians as people who routinely interact with ‘warm-hearted’ humanoid robots.
(Not to mention that 1/3 of the story is about a Japan-heavy robot-concept hotel chain… but that’s a different issue.)
I’ve never yet seen them misbehave in a notable way, but they seem like nothing more than trays with wheels and basic path finding.
All of them basically center their feel around the futuristic automation spiel.
No ordering though. don't know if refills could come out.
EDIT: pho #1 in sunnyvale ca
What I'd like is for a "wait free" experience to spread beyond counter-serve. I have, very rarely, seen a QR code I can scan on the table allowing me to order and pay via phone. Then my food just arrives. That's seamless and frustration-free.
I can fold tshirts, for example, faster than that machine, since it looks like it's on the user to sort out the topology of the shirt for the machine.
I re-watched an episode recently as an adult and it was hiliarious.
mrs robinson was doing laundry, and put all the clothes in a washing machine and closed the lid. Then she immediately opened the lid and pulled everything out, it was already neatly folded and in a bag.
(and curiously the machine was sitting outside the spaceship)
EDIT: "How to do laundry in space"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4bdaN6MRT8
lol
It was very exciting since I haven't witnessed it in the real world, and my daughter was in awe. Not quite sure how efficient it really was, more a novelty if anything.
The robots have room for improvement regarding motion and general intelligence, but they absolutely nail the non-threatening look and feel.
If I had a robotic assistant at home or in the workplace, I’d want something WALL-E like. Emotive lights or even an 8-bit display with expressions is fine. But no hair or anything completely unrelated to function, please.