https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
In particular: it's clear from the context they're talking about non-founder employees; simply by the principle of charity you should assume the author --- who sat on the board of a pretty successful VC-funded company --- knows that founder employees are often on boards.
Mostly though, this "who was first" discussion is an attractive nuisance for us to bicker on about, and we're asked by the guidelines not to take the bait on that stuff.
Path dependence means personal experience is rarely very generalizable.
Of course if you've made a systematic study of corporate governance and have data on thousands of companies, things are different.
Please review the HN Guidelines and ask yourself if posting your comment added to or detracted from the value of this discussion:
I’ll help you out. A bunch of us here deal with board members on a daily basis. Some board members are great, others not so much. To hear that there is a board out there that gave voting rights to an employee makes us experience two simultaneous sensations: 1. Hell yeah!, and 2. I wonder if they picked the right employee.
I’ll leave it at that.
Do you think I, in 20 years of working in the industry, haven't dealt with bad board members? How about a little curiosity instead of whatever the hell you're dishing in this thread.
Let me help you out: you're a stupid little troll and your contributions to this discussion are like little turd droppings that just stink up the room. Please kindly contribute constructively or fuck the hell off.