A platform that bans left-wing speech is not a free speech one. Simple as that. Yes I know some work hard in redefining "free speech" to measure "ability of right wing extremists being unopposed". That does not make it reasonable for HN.
Making the system invite-only may be a requirement.
If needed, split a team of moderators by political association and have each moderator handle the users of the "opposite" side.
Otherwise you end up getting shadow banned for reporting an actual call to violence which then took place.
This isn’t partisan hypocrisy — it’s applying an objective standard to a bad-faith argument.
I said that it is not free speech platform.
So they did. You should be happy?
It's really just about choosing who moderates your content. 0 moderation is not possible, so if you don't like Twitter, you can use Parler, and if you don't like Reddit, you can use Retalk, etc etc
Moreover, this title was not written by Parler. The free speech platform is editorializing by submitter.