The data is what it is. The conclusions however, are in the opinion space. I don't have a problem with the facts, its the interpretation which concerns me.

Obviously, I hold a partisan view. I don't believe in some morally neutral vantage point to view this activity, It simply doesn't exist and there are many potential false moral equivalences in that anyway. Social policy in medicine and vaccination is not a neutral point, its objectively "sided" -you either agree or disagree. My reading of this website is they want to disagree, and somehow project "and its justified" from the data.

That "from the data" is where I start to have problems. Data is always coloured and nuanced. I would expect the CDC and others to be drawing opposite conclusions from the same underlying information model.

I would prefer this to be understood to be an equally partisan, opposed view website. It may be trying to claim some higher neutral point objective view outcome, but net overall its not.