Also, many women wear heels making them seem taller.
If you’re seeing a lot of women over six feet, you’re either around a lot of Dutch women or they’re wearing elevating shoes (heels, tall flats/clogs.) Or perhaps you slouch. :)
How often do you see women not wearing any shoes? Unless you have a beach lifestyle it can't be that often?
I am 6’7” and I rarely see people my height, but when I do I have aa strange feeling because I am typically the tallest person in a room. When we are the same height, they feel taller to me because I am not familiar with looking up to the top of someone’s head.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_human_height_by_countr...
The average American man older than 20 years of age is 5'9 and if you dig deeper into the source at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03-046-508.pdf
Less than 15% of men (aged 20 and older) are 6' or taller.
Once you factor in women, only about 7% of the population is 6' or taller.
The weight issue has gotten bigger because, well, people have gotten bigger while the infrastructure for storing bodies remains the same. This all seems relatively straightforward and unsurprising. We have the same type of problem with other old infrastructure built to hold human bodies -- like airplane seats.
Today I learned that I'm apparently too tall to donate my body to science. Now that's surprising!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_States#/...
Singling out a statistically spurious reason to dismiss a major factor is weak.
>A lot of hedging and hemming aside, I think I've pretty much captured the whole article.
The article is not hedging or hemming anything, it's making it very clear that the main reason why bodies are being rejected is due to obesity as opposed to people being too tall. Furthermore, the article is arguing that this is a problem that is only going to get worse since people are getting more and more obese, but not more and more tall.
You're arguing against stances that no one here has taken.
My original comment was to add precision to what was an otherwise fairly open-ended claim; to turn the "often too tall" into a precise figure of 7%. The article is not about that 7%, which is a figure that has likely remained fairly consistent for decades. Instead, the bulk of the article is about the 40% of Americans who are too obese. You have decided to dwell on a detail that 7% is actually significant (ignoring the fact that there's a lot of overlap between the 7% of Americans who are over 6' and those who are obese) and in doing so have turned this into a petty semantic argument.
What exactly do you think it means to claim that an article is hedging and hemming? If you're actually arguing in good faith instead of trolling, you should be able to provide a clear answer to that, but something tells me you won't and will instead continue to repeat the same semantic drivel over and over again.