People that encountered network security probably know the name "Bro" much better. Apparently they rebranded in 2018.
Wikipedia has the following to say about it:
> Dr. Paxson originally named the software "Bro" as a warning regarding George Orwell's Big Brother from the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. In 2018 the project leadership team decided to rename the software. At LBNL in the 1990s, the developers ran their sensors as a pseudo-user named “zeek”, thereby inspiring the name change in 2018.
even most of the enterprise solutions sold for network monitoring proudly boast that they use bro under the hood for their stream parsing engine.
I agree, and I'd like to understand the reason why "probably" disappeared from the press release. If you claim something, you should be able to back it up with some numbers, right? I'm a big fan of Bro and fully agree with the "leading solution" or "everybody is using it" phrases, I just miss the data that would make it the number one.
Could your POV be somewhat US-centric?
I hear this phrase about many software platforms. That's why I'd like to see some numbers before someone uses an absolute qualifier. I have no idea how popular is Zeek against OSSEC, Suricata or Snort these days, I'm just wary of claiming something without providing any justification.
Also startups make up almost nothing of the ecosystem. Fortune 1000 and Gov have millions of different departments that have their own requirements.
Zeek is cool but I always thought Bro was a neat name for a sec product.
I wonder how long until Palantir rebrands...
Also the least popular.
I have heard of: Ganglia, nagios, graylog, grafana, science logic and others. And I've used most of them.
As part of Windows, I would speculate it serves a function similar to something like Little Snitch on macOS, but that’s just a guess. Maybe they have something different in mind.
I think it ships with IDS rules nowadays, but we see it generally more for manual impl. We see often fed into Splunk or ELK to feed custom detections, and especially enriching context to simplify investigating alerts by detection tools. Its investment into cross-record correlation IDs make graph-based investigations super effective: you can grab all sessions at an impact period and see them fan out across entities, resources, time, etc!
We mostly see it in sec teams in gov + DIY/code-heavy enterprise. Super popular bc those teams have more time to figure out tuned use of the rich low-level data, maybe budget to store it, and OSS means they can avoid the vendor dance.
CoreLight, who we did a popular webinar with awhile back showing how to enable rich visual hunting & investigation for the data by combining with Graphistry, is the biggest dedicated vendor building hw/sw to make it all more manageable at scale. So seeing in Windows is probably big news for their community..