With a lot less whining about 'the woke mob'.
With a lot less whining about 'the woke mob'.
> But attacks would come from the left, not the right. Arab and Muslim filmmakers and their white supporters accused Ms. Smaker of Islamophobia and American propaganda. Some suggested her race was disqualifying, a white woman who presumed to tell the story of Arab men.
> Sundance leaders reversed themselves and apologized.
> Abigail Disney, a grandniece of Walt Disney, had been the executive producer of “Jihad Rehab” and called it “freaking brilliant” in an email to Ms. Smaker. Now she disavowed it.
> The film “landed like a truckload of hate,” Ms. Disney wrote in an open letter.
You may not refer to it as a "woke mob", but that really seems what happened. As someone who has always identified as liberal, it is absolutely shocking to me how large swaths of the American left are OK with the idea that "Some suggested her race was disqualifying, a white woman who presumed to tell the story of Arab men". To me, telling someone they aren't allowed to do something because of their race is the absolute antithesis of everything I felt it was to be "liberal".
I don't really think of racism as a strictly partisan thing, the biggest partisan divide is regarding who the mob is most likely to be racist towards.
Blue collar racism is much more inclusive than white collar D&I. The expectation is to be able to take and give shit there.
And while there are definitely understandable concerns about interviewing a basically imprisoned population, 1. the fact that only a handful of prisoners opted to speak while the rest declined shows that they did have at least some degree of choice, and 2. the viewer can balance what the documentary presents against the circumstances in which it was created.
Considering the actual content of the documentary it’s hard to see how else this story could be told.
Finally, I thought we were past the whole “only people of a community can make stories about that community” thing. It would be one thing if someone with a similar background had stayed in the facility for a year and also made an equivalent story. Arguably they should get higher weight. But no one else did. This story is not displacing anyone else. In its absence all we have is a vacuum.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/film/2022/j...
According to that recently renamed film “The UnRedacted.”
National review is going to do its thing, though the times seemed to take a dim view of its Sundance cancelation.
Here’s a nytimes “gift” link
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/25/us/sundance-jihad-rehab-m...