i think both fly.io and litestream were projects that spoke sweet words to the average developer wanting to build features without the infra headache, and what made sqlite so appealing was its simplicity. litestream kept that simplicity too. but i don't think the avg developer wants to spin up their own LiteFS. At a glance at the repo, i have no idea how to deploy this thing. It would have served fly and litestream users better to have kept replication within litestream.

just as no one using postgres on RDS will ever leave RDS not b/c RDS is so much better than its competitors but because the hurdle is too great and the migration so risky. right now, fly is the only one who lessens the burden to use LiteFS and as long as they're the only one, the average developer is essentially locked in.