Hacker News Reader

That new HTTP server (Deno.serve) is being used

Bun’s http server is single-threaded, single-process right now. I think it’s really important to get single-threaded performance right before concurrency. Bun will eventually support builtin clustering/concurrency but it doesn’t yet

View on HN

So Deno benchmark says deno is faster and bun says bun is faster?

Thats why I hate benchmark by package author/publisher.

If you want to see which one is faster (kind of pointless since both bun and deno/flash are not production ready) test your own application, and not an "hello world" or a specific workload that has been optimized to win a specific benchmark.

Deno is not production ready?

The new fast webserver (flash) is still --unstable, hence not production ready. It has a performance comparable to nodejs+uWebSockets.js and bun (that should be using under the hood a slighly modified version of uWebSockets).

edit: as a silly point of reference, an hello world that writes the same headers and the same body on a 2016 intel macbookpro is able to serve 125k rps in bun, 145k rps in deno/flash and 140k rps in nodejs+uws.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com