Is there a compelling reason to switch from Joplin to Obsidian? Honest question.
Is there a compelling reason to switch from Joplin to Obsidian? Honest question.
I'm not a huge fan of Joplin's UX, but not having to pay for sync (and being able to choose the backend for sync) is important enough to me that it is a differentiator greater than the overall UX. I can point all of my Joplin installs to the same S3 bucket and boom done.
I'm hearing that with Obsidian you can use OneDrive/iCloud/Dropbox/etc for sync but that is all based on the sync provider. To me that brings ambiguity about how concurrency and conflict resolution are dealt with, since the app kinda capitulates that to the external storage engine right?
There is no expectation that you use sync, it's simply an option for those that want it and are likely less tech oriented.
I think they mean free, as in free software. Obsidian is not free neither open source software.
I imagine that applies to many of us. How many people are looking to use Obsidian purely for personal use?
I struggle to understand the mentality that deems that unreasonable. It'd be a bargain at 5x the price.
The overwhelming majority, if the Obsidian message boards are anything to go by.
I wouldn't want to use a product that only now reached v1.0, for a business. It's not Figma, or a Google Docs type app where corporate use cases are very apparent. At best, Obsidian would be good for a knowledgebase, but there are better wiki tools out there for that.
Obsidian does personal knowledge management best, because of its customizability.
I'm not sure what you mean by this, I use github to sync across devices, you could technically use any solution you like.