Hacker News Reader

Comment by grammers | Hacker News Reader

This. I've switched to iOS recently and I hate that I need two apps now. Already longing to go back to Android.

When I switched from Android to iOS this was the number one technical regression, and for years my go-to example of nice things Apple keeps from us. It’s unbelievable how Signal is sabotaging itself here.

Just use iMessage. It's not as secure as Signal since the server has the keys, but it's the easiest way to ensure that the majority of text messages you send are encrypted.

There was just an article that said that 88% of teens have an iPhone. That means that almost all of their communication is encrypted.

So when the server has the key, how can you say it's encrypted?

I mean in context of signal we don't just talk about some form of transport encryption but e2e

It's various levels of encryption that are acceptable depending on your risk level.

I'm mainly concerned about SMS spoofing and mass surveillance. iMessage protects against that. The only way the government can read your messages is by serving Apple with a warrant to obtain your iCloud backup.

If I had a lower risk tolerance, I would disable iCloud backups to improve my security.

I don't think people are only concerned about the government, but rather the corporations that own your data (via storing the encryption key to use whenever they want, to look through whatever they want)

In the end signal and imessage (with backups off) provide roughly the same claimed guarantee here (on a technical level at least). They both promise not to secretly inject additional client keys into your account, (to at least obtain a forward-operating 'wire tap'), but the software you're running is all opaque and could certainly do so if they wanted (or were compelled) to.

I mean you followed Snowden right?

I would argue that if you are relevant enough apple and sms are both equally easy to get for them.

If we talk here about signal, I don't think the alternative should be iMessage but telegram etc.

Anecdotal evidence, but I've never had someone ask me to join Telegram.

In terms of encrypted messaging, the popularity in my friend group is:

1. iMessage

2. Signal

3. WhatsApp (only for talking to non-US people)

4. Matrix

fwiw, iMessage is actually E2E encrypted (without Apple storing the key) if you either don't have iCloud backup enabled OR don't enable "Message in the Cloud".

You need WhatsApp anyway, you’ll have several apps whatever you do.

>You need WhatsApp anyway, you’ll have several apps whatever you do.

Do I? Not being snarky here, I just really don't understand why I need WhatsApp.

No one I know uses WhatsApp to communicate with me. No business I deal with uses WhatsApp to communicate with me.

In fact, I'm not sure what value WhatsApp provides as I've never used it.

I'd appreciate it if you'd elucidate on your point. Mostly because if you're correct, I'm obviously missing something extremely important.

My understanding is that in many places outside the US it's near-universal. I've never used it myself either.

I suppose it depends where you are. I’m in Europe.

Almost everyone I message with defaults to WhatsApp, or even insists on it. A few also have Signal or Facebook Messenger or iMessage.

SMS is only for notifications and such. Even some businesses default to WhatsApp.

Historically WhatsApp filled in where SMS was harder to use, and places tended to use either WhatsApp or SMS ubiquitously. So the communities most affected by Signal dropping SMS don’t have an existing social need for WhatsApp.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com