That using a method of production that naturally exposes it hydrogen would produce higher quality steel is surprising! We should still definitely have a link to the study!
That using a method of production that naturally exposes it hydrogen would produce higher quality steel is surprising! We should still definitely have a link to the study!
The issue with hydrogen, which was first noted IIRC in the high-pressure Haber-Bosch ammonia production process, in which H2 and N2 at high pressure over a catalyst in a steel chamber forms NH3, is that free hydrogen reacts with the carbon in the steel under these conditions, which caused the pressure chambers to regularly explode (solution was a sacrificial lining of the chambers which was regularly replaced). For low-pressure H2 it may not be much of a problem, but that's not very efficient for transport.
Ammonia combustion generates NOx smog, and ammonia is pretty toxic to store and transport as a gas. For fertilizer it's stored as (NH4)(NO3) or similar.
Hydrogen production has a few major use cases, but replacing natural gas is not one of them. Iron reduction, nitrogen reduction, carbon reduction, in industrial settings, is about it.
Cast Iron is also impacted by hydrogen embrittlement, albeit iron is usually already pretty brittle so folks don’t use it where that kind of failure matters as much.
There are of course ways to treat cast iron so it's decently durable (ductile iron), but it's still pretty brittle compared to 99% of steel in the real world.
Incorrect. That is the maximum for low carbon steel (also called mild steel - the most common form of steel).
Wikipedia says “The carbon content of steel is between 0.002% and 2.14% by weight for plain carbon steel”. “Plain carbon-iron alloys with a higher than 2.1% carbon content are known as cast iron.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_iron
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cast_iron
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_steel