The Great Rebundling is coming. It's a bad idea
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
What the author misses is that people are so saturated with content that they don't need to subscribe to everything.
I don't have the time to watch everything that I am interested in on just Netflix. What is the point of subscribing to another service, that I won't have time to watch?
It wouldn't matter if they all merged into one giant streaming platform. I don't have the time to watch everything.
Then we got satellite options, so you can choose from your physically connected cable providers, or a satellite, or the old broadcast channels. More choice, but still limited.
Why does it matter when looking at streaming? Because we've removed a layer. Before streaming, your cable/satellite company contracted with content providers then packaged it up into deals they thought you would like and sold them to you. Today, we contract directly with the content providers. Maybe bundles of providers are a bad idea, maybe not - but we are now directly in control of which services get our money, so we can "vote with our dollars" in a way that we never could under cable TV or satellite.
I wouldn't call merging Discovery Plus and HBO Max into one service a "great rebundling".