It’s so silly that you’re prevented from hiring whatever gender you want. A bunch of guys want to start a video game company and now they are forced to hire a woman which throws the whole vibe of the company off.
If there were no unintended consequences (I hope that you do not intend this widespread discrimination) then I would be fine with you running your company that way as I would be happy with there being less competition for all the excellent women applicants, and I believe that a mixed sex workplace will outperform a solely male one. A belief I find much easier to hold than dudes prefer working with dudes or some such nonsense.
I know you probably think you’re doing a good thing by championing these laws, but in reality, your support is aiding the degredation of the natural family.
It’s a terrible tradeoff we’ve made, but it can be reversed.
On top of that fact I’ve given my own opinion - that I would be happy to employ women and that I believe a mixed workplace can outcompete ones wholly made up of men. Nowhere did I mention rebuilding the traditional family nor any other corollary.
I think you should stick to the arguments presented to you instead of inferring too much, much like the inference that because a guy might prefer working with other men that he’d prefer to work solely with other men. If you want to know my intentions it’s best you ask but I can tell you that they go as far as “I can outcompete you” and “I think you’re wrong” but no further.