There's older video of a previous prototype taking off, landing, and flying around.[1] That gives a sense of how it handles.
It's a reasonable design. More practical than the eHang.[2] The eHang has been around for years; it's a quadrotor drone scaled up to carry people. It has the big problem of all pure-thrust craft - no glide capability. Flies OK, but not much range. There have been a few other drone-like vehicles built like that. None seem to be deployed. Range and battery life are a huge problem.
Having a wing helps. Once transition to forward flight has been made, power requirements are much lower. So the range becomes useful. And there's at least the potential to glide to a controlled crash on power failure.
There's been a lot of interest lately in VTOLs that take off on electric power and then use a wing and pusher prop for cruise. There are even drones like that, with ranges of hundreds of miles. This is much simpler mechanically than tilting wing concepts, which are mechanical nightmares. Look up how the Osprey's power train works.
It's also nice seeing those props above head height, rather than down at ankle and head level like the eHang.
This has potential.
If you are going to believe the BS header video, you might as well believe this BS story.
To be fair, the posters were absolutely correct. It was soon after Kitty Hawk that it became possible and even commonplace to fly on commercial passenger aircraft from NY to Paris in 15 hours or less. Of course, this depends on exactly how you define "soon"...