> In some cases, the NILFS2 is safer storage for your data than ZFS.
What cases? Do you just mean due to continuous snapshots protecting against accidental deletes or such, or are there more "under the covers" things it fixes?
What cases? Do you just mean due to continuous snapshots protecting against accidental deletes or such, or are there more "under the covers" things it fixes?
https://www.reddit.com/r/btrfs/comments/fcntc6/qcow2_on_btrf...
You can either make a sub volume and mount it with nocow or set the +C file attribute to disable CoW:
http://blog.jim.nz/2015/12/04/btrfs-subvolume-with-nocow.htm...
Doesn’t really look like nilfs2 has this kind of flexibility, though