>quality of paper
you are extremely unlikely to find this as book metadata
you are extremely unlikely to find this as book metadata
"The paper quality is better as well, as most often they are printed on acid-free paper like a hardback book." - https://biblio.co.uk/book_collecting_terminology/trade-paper...
(I've found this to be relevant when sourcing physical copies of out of print books.)
Just because the book is in the public domain does not mean I want a book that looks like a fanzine.
Maybe it does not scale, I agree. This is why a curator is IMO important.
as for the metadata, that would be retrospectively impossible. your best chance would be to filter out Amazon as a publisher