Tech Support - Onfire vs On Fire
rachelbythebay.com
rachelbythebay.com
Needless to say if you tried to apply this to programmers, by integrating it into the bug tracking and source control systems, it would be gamed pretty damn quickly.
The majority of techs were supposed to sit there, take calls, and work tickets. When they were actually at work and not on a break, in the bathroom, or on lunch, they should have been "Auto-In" on the phones while working on tickets. If they finished a ticket and a call wasn't presented to them, they should have immediately gone to the "unassigned" view to grab something new.
You're right that it could represent a long phone call. That kind of stuff happens. I used to run these tools on myself and see a dip in my data. I'd worry about what happened and then realize, "oh yeah, that's when some Enterprise customer called up and needed hand-holding through fixing Tomcat".
The difference with a long phone call is that their idle time would then be followed by a ticket being created or updated to document what happened in the call. I had another view of the data which would let you spot this situation easily. It's not evident on the graphical view shown in this post.
Also, long phone calls were relatively infrequent. Most issues could be resolved in a couple of minutes. "Please unlock my control panel" is short. "Your hardware just took us down again and we are hopping mad" is long. Most of the calls resembled the former and not the latter, fortunately.
It's when you see the same people, day after day, with these l-o-n-g gaps and no ticket updates to suggest a phone call that you start wondering. After long enough, you realize there are some who are just not pulling their weight.
If you meant the ticketing system, you could see "live" status on techs in that system by just asking to see the "active queue" page. If they had tickets assigned to them, it would be obvious. I don't work there any more, though.
If not that, then I am not quite sure what it would be. Please advise if so (or contact me through my site, URL in profile) - it could be interesting!
Core value prop:
Managers are always very curious where they stand on performance.
Provide benchmark service so that organisations could see how they are performing relative to their peers. For an organisation with 4 employees (budget $400k), $1k per year for a benchmark report would probably pass muster. (keyword research "service desk metrics" - I think you can win this space)
How to go about this:
Integration into FreshDesk, ZenDesk and other ITIL etc. Anonymize data, segment into industry
Alternate value prop:
Enable tighter feedback loop for line managers and provide them with actionable ideas (intervention, escalation, rotation, dispatch, pair).
Other possibilities:
Pipe activity to a TV screen in the service desk area. There's an overlap with existing software, so you'd do it only if you could provide more value than other software can. For example, you can gamify it (though not my preference).
Provide useful reports for end of year employee review.
When badly done, benchmarks can result in the wrong incentives being created. However, you have a lot of text data that can be used to gauge the complexity of a task. May be there's something in there.