So, the first time we standardised symmetric encryption was DES in 1977. DES was
at that time already known to have keys which are too small (56 bits) and blocks which are too short (64 bits) to be safe against a powerful attacker (like, say, the US government) but it appeared otherwise to be a good design. The algorithm actually has one flaw in its pre-DES existence, unsuspected by academics, but which the NSA had in fact fixed in DES because they knew about it.
And sure enough, even today the most practical attacks on DES are in effect brute force on those too-small keys and too-short blocks - this brute force is practical although very expensive.
Now, in 2001 DES was superseded by AES, which is used for this purpose by Signal. In AES the keys are larger (128, 192, or 256 bits, Signal uses 256) and the block size is longer too (128 bits), thus fixing the only problem DES still had. We are done.
So, while of course nobody can prove it won't happen in 30 years, it is extremely unlikely.
You might think to yourself, surely computers get faster and smaller, so the brute force problem would still arise maybe in a few decades? Nope. In the late 20th and early 21st century humans experienced something that's only going to happen once, and it has distorted our perspective on the matter. The machines are not, in fact, going to keep getting faster and smaller, there are physical limits imposed by the universe. They will get gradually a bit faster than they are now, and we will make a lot more of them, but nowhere close to enough even if (for some insane reason) our civilisation decided its only goal is to decrypt my old Signal messages.