Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by gavinsyancey | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

gavinsyancey

It works, and does what it is supposed to. Why does it need a new version?

View on HN

To compete with the newer, blazingly fast tools

What are the competitors in the jq space?

At least jaq[1] gojq[2], and jp[3] (this last of which is jmespath rather than the jq query language)

[1]: https://github.com/01mf02/jaq

[2]: https://github.com/itchyny/gojq

[3]: https://github.com/jmespath/jp

I especially love gojq thanks to this change:

    $ echo '{"alpha":"beta"}' | jq -r '"hello \(.alpha\)"'
    jq: error: syntax error, unexpected INVALID_CHARACTER (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 1:
    "hello \(.alpha\)"
    jq: 1 compile error

    $ echo '{"alpha":"beta"}' | gojq -r '"hello \(.alpha\)"'
    gojq: invalid query: "hello \(.alpha\)"
        "hello \(.alpha\)"
                       ^  unexpected token "\\"

because (a) muscle memory (b) sure, it's easy to spot that mistake in an 18 character expression, but for bigger ones, getouttahere

There's a particularly complicated system I built a few years ago that heavily leaned on jq for configuring some backend systems. It had lots of variables piped in and so that particular error was common. From your snippet, I'm pretty sure gojq would have saved me many hours of debugging.

Yeah the ergonomy and error messaging of jq is complicated

I'm not a big fan of the language, but it works

jp --help

"It's complicated, you know"

Xidel for XPath on JSON, XML, and HTML: https://github.com/benibela/xidel

Reply on news.ycombinator.com