I don't think "don't let the plebes have the models" is a good stance. But neither is pretending that the ethics and bias issues aren't here.
I don't think "don't let the plebes have the models" is a good stance. But neither is pretending that the ethics and bias issues aren't here.
Most people represented in photos are younger. Same story.
The problematic issue is the media has morphed reality with unreal images of people/families that don't match society so unreal expectations make people think that having white people generated from a white dataset is problematic.
There are lots of other ways you could get training data, but they might not be so cheap. You could have humans give English descriptions to images from other language contexts. I'm guessing there's interesting things to do with translation. But all the weird stuff about bodies, physical objects intersecting etc ... maybe it should also be rendering training images from parametric 3d models? Maybe they should be commissioning new images with phrases that are likely to the language model but unlikely to the image model. Maybe they should build classifiers on images for race/gender/age and do stratified sampling to match some population statistics (yes I'm aware this has its own issues). There are lots of potential technical tools one could try to improve the situation.
Implying that the whole world must change before one project becomes less biased is just asking for more biased tech in the world