I wasn't familiar with the name, but this article is interesting: https://web.archive.org/web/20220901142826/https://www.theat...
I can understand why the WH was concerned.
I can understand why the WH was concerned.
When you give someone a gun, especially someone powerful, especially the federal government, you can not predict who will be holding it in the future and where they will aim it.
I find it interesting that other bans don't get the same concern from the usual suspects, e.g., abortion gag laws, library book bans, don't say gay laws, etc. Should the former president retake office I expect bans of political enemies and more -- the type of abuse that you rightfully fear.
This is a nuanced subject and requires corresponding consideration. We all agree that some speech isn't good for society but remain at odds over what that speech is.
It always blows my mind when someone makes a claim and then cites a source and their source actually proves the exact opposite.
They never acknowledge the self-own.