It's less unsettling than who's currently in charge of it.
At least he's committed to transparency in moderation and the algorithm.
At least he's committed to transparency in moderation and the algorithm.
Seems they just have a "system" or "human" problem because tons of spam accounts get reported but it seems to take a long time to get them removed.
Why do you think and attribute him to those achievements?
Are you? Tell us.
If you don't agree that people can be hurt with language, than you don't agree with content moderation in the first place so your objection is meaningless... those who don't agree that people can be hurt with language arguing about content moderation is like those who hate all cheese arguing over what we should put on the cheese plate.
I never said I disagree that language can be hurtful, and I never disagreed with content moderation (Both things, I have never said, you're putting words in my mouth).
All I'm saying is that guidelines and rules should be clear instead of hidden from public view cause then that leads to arbitrary enforcement, and clear bias.
The argument that making it public will make people "workaround it" is terrible, because thats the whole point of the rules. "Heres what you can do and can't do, if what you do doesn't violate the current rules, but shouldn't be done, then the rules need to be revised".
You really believe he is “committed to transparency in moderation and the algorithm”?
I have some real estate on Mars for sale if you are interested.
He was just sued for his lack of commitment.