There are plenty of academic legal societies very interested in “states’ rights”, “returning to the constitution”, “memorializing the Confederacy”, etc. I don’t see a important distinction between an explicit statement and dog-whistle so thinly veiled that everyone knows what it stands for.
That’s an interesting statement.
I’ve personally attended a memorial ceremony hosted by the United Daughters of the Confederacy where a Black woman spoke for an hour about the conditions under which Blacks, both enslaved and free, existed in the Confederacy. She was a UDC member, which means that she was a thoroughly documented descendant of a Confederate soldier. In her case, that was a man who was offered his freedom in exchange for military service.
You say “everyone knows it stands for”, but my experience says that a more truthful statement would be “most people believe they know what it stands for”.
Deliver or be proved the bullshit artist you are.
first: tone & language means this is silly of me to reply.
second: how about basically the entire existence of the US
so many examples of government & local police enforced white ethnic activism and active racism & enslavement.
fugitive slave act. legally forced segregation & jim crow laws.
Also, you were not explicitly asked or referenced in my comment so your first point is irrelevant.
Yes, especially dense.
you clearly asked "Can you give me one example where such a society was allowed?" that is past tense, not bounded to now. I answered. You are wrong.
Oh and BTW white ethnic activism is alive and well.