They have a commanding position in the enterprise. What’s keeping them from crossing those enterprise boundaries?
They have a commanding position in the enterprise. What’s keeping them from crossing those enterprise boundaries?
These days, a consumer + biz page login page can look like this:
https://www.xsplit.com/user/auth
There's almost no good reason to require emails/password rather than let users use their preferred IdP.
I think the reason it's less common is simply that indie devs assume everyone uses free Google Workspaces. This year we're seeing more Microsoft Logins. Perhaps one reason is that now Google Workspaces is no longer free and startups are realizing they can get actual Office with actual apps at the same per $6 to $12 per user cost. Then in turn, supporting that login.
I've gotten career advice several times to get a GMail instead, because Microsoft was considered out of date and backward (not so much anymore).
Plus, if this works as well as it does with the "corporate" AzureAD, it would be a better experience for users. Just "log on with your Windows account".
Not saying that's necessarily a good, thing, mind. Only that I expect support to broaden.
Microsoft is the only company I deal with where I cannot reliably authenticate. I wish they'd just stop trying to run consumer accounts.
I have a friend who managed to do get into this mess, and he's still not sure how he did it.
firstname.lastname@companybizname.TLD is apparently linked to two separate identities at Microsoft, one is a business account, one is a "personal" account.
Every time he experiences any kind of login issue, this bites him :/
If I indeed recall correctly, then that doesn't really make sense. Just force people to make a different, actual personal account, and have them use that.
Except if you lose access to the work email address by switching jobs, surely you're one forgotten password away from permantently losing access to the personal account too? It's linked to your _work_ email (only)...
However, your friend can get out of this scenario by following the instructions on this site:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/account-billing/change-t...
They'll end up with <whatever_they_can_find>@outlook.com for their Microsoft account. When using Org services via a browser, you'll automatically use your Org account. When using consumer services, you'll automatically use your Microsoft account (assuming you've selected stay sign-in for both).
Thank goodness for that!
> However, your friend can get out of this scenario by following the instructions on this site
Thanks for the tip, will try and walk him through this next time I'm with him.
> hey'll end up with <whatever_they_can_find>@outlook.com for their Microsoft account
I doubt they actually need/want access to the Microsoft account. They don't use this work email address for any consumer services, as far as I'm aware -although how could one tell what services it could be associated with?
Microsoft made it better by preventing the scenario from occurring beginning 3 - 5 years ago.
Facebook and Google provide "Sign-in with Facebook/Google account" not because they do it out of goodwill, to only make it "easier" or "smoother" to login -- it obviously cost resources on their end to enable such features -- it helps them better identify users and then serve ads. And Google can be really aggressive -- try reddit or Quora.
Apple, on the other hand, tries to sell "login with Apple account" with a different approach: they advertise the "privacy" part of it and how you can hide your email address by using it's sign-in service. And they have a term where login with Apple must be enabled on an app and website if a company has an app on the app store and it supports any other third-party login. In other words, if Reddit supports login with Google on iPhone, it must also support login with Apple ID. This helped the adoption a lot.
For Microsoft, they are relatively late and small in the ad business (for now) so I guess they don't really care about getting more of your information via sign-in services. And they are not on this privacy bandwagon as Apple does. So they really have no incentive for this.
One cannot get an e-mail address without a phone. One cannot get a phone without a credit check. A credit check requires a social security number.
(when it doesn't work, you'll usually get an error message about the number not being supported or words to that effect)