Macro quantum mechanics
foxnews.com
foxnews.com
The article is here: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6060/1253.abstract
Entangling Macroscopic Diamonds at Room Temperature
K. C. Lee, M. R. Sprague, B. J. Sussman, J. Nunn, N. K. Langford, X.-M. Jin, T. Champion, P. Michelberger, K. F. Reim, D. England, D. Jaksch, and I. A. Walmsley
ABSTRACT: Quantum entanglement in the motion of macroscopic solid bodies has implications both for quantum technologies and foundational studies of the boundary between the quantum and classical worlds. Entanglement is usually fragile in room-temperature solids, owing to strong interactions both internally and with the noisy environment. We generated motional entanglement between vibrational states of two spatially separated, millimeter-sized diamonds at room temperature. By measuring strong nonclassical correlations between Raman-scattered photons, we showed that the quantum state of the diamonds has positive concurrence with 98% probability. Our results show that entanglement can persist in the classical context of moving macroscopic solids in ambient conditions.
which was previously submitted here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3302904
and also covered in the New Scientist: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21235-entangled-diamon...
But a more appropriate answer is that there probably could be some sort of application, but unless we start building stuff we won't know what we're capable of and will be unable to engineer cool gizmos that use it.
For one, financial market traders would have a field day with such.
First, they helps us learn about and control decoherence, which is the primary obstacle to building a quantum computer. Decoherence is the reason everything doesn't behave quantum mechanically all the time, and its strength generally grows exponentially with the size of the system being studied. Building a useful quantum computer will require suppressing decoherence for order 100 qubits.
Second, these experiments test quantum mechanics in new physical regimes where it might break (to be superseded by new physics). Just like one will find a discrepancy with Newtonian mechanics if one starts doing experiments near the speed of light, the suspicion is that quantum mechanics might breakdown when applied to large objects. People who are unsatisfied with the interpretation of quantum mechanics are especially interested in this possibility.
It's hard to tell for sure without being able to read the journal article, though.
Also, it's important to note that the center-of-mass position of the diamonds has not been put in a superposition, which is what people usually mean when they say "macroscopic superposition". This experiment only shows that a certain vibrational mode in the diamond is superposed. (For all I know, that vibrational mode might just involve a few atoms.) Unfortunately, this type of link-bait is quite common in the quantum information community.