what would be accomplished by geoblocking a states's tourism site?
Isn't the core point of state sites like this to attract tourists? Does geoblocking them help with this goal?
Some years ago Arizona paid to put very large advertisements in downtown Toronto (Canada) to attract cold candians in the winter... things like that may work, geoblocking certainly wont.
edit: and i'll add that the team who put the site together is long gone and the people who maintain content (if any) have no idea what geoblocking even is. So don't bother sending them an email...
Avoiding GDPR compliance problems?
The UK GDPR sets out seven key principles: - Lawfulness, fairness and transparency. - Purpose limitation. - Data minimisation. - Accuracy. - Storage limitation. - Integrity and confidentiality (security) - Accountability.
Dont keep track of any user info and you should be OK?
Many of the blocked countries dont have GDPR regulations, so there is that.
There is also the vast majority of US government sites which are not geoblocked.
https://kentucky.gov/Pages/home.aspx - works just fine from Canada?
Is there a compelling reason besides being friendly? Like treaties or something?