Nakamura analysing “most incriminating evidence against Hans Niemann” [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
- 7m 20s: Context on metric used (note that Feller was confirmed cheating): https://i.imgur.com/jgaCLc4.png
- 12m 20s. (paraphrasing) A clinically perfect game (by Carlsen) is still only 79%
- 17m 10s Naka's 2 best games to analyse on chessbase
- 20m Naka says Hans's analysis of one game (not against Carlsen) was "ridiculous"
- 24m 30s "once you see (a good move) you can't unsee it ... but until you see it, it's not obvious at all"
- 27m 30s - "Fischer had 0 games at 100% in his entire career"
- 72% (17m 30s) Against Mishra ("for many people it was a most suspicious game"). Naka: "this is a good performance but it's not insane". Yosha: "nothing too suspicious"
- 100% (21m 15s)
- Several more 100% (from ~25m)