I tried replacing Google with TikTok, and it worked better than I thought
theverge.com
theverge.com
Why explicitly state that? Because using TikTok as a search engine is dumb. It is probably quite good to use for searching clips such as (as the author implied in the article) "best NBA plays by Kobe", but it will not go any further than that.
[0]: https://www.businessinsider.com/nearly-half-genz-use-tiktok-...
Google's first result which takes up the whole browser window is a video sponsored by Lowe's. Scrolling down are a few YouTube links to videos.
Tiktok gives me 4 videos, but one of them is about hanging a picture on drywall. The other three seem like they would help me.
Idk I just feel like Google and Facebook have had decades to work on this stuff, even inventing some tech behind it, but Tiktok's only been around a few years and does what they do at least as good. What have Google and Facebook been doing all this time?
With all the data Google and Facebook have on everyone why is Tiktok, which I'm using with an email unconnected to anything else of mine and all iPhone privacy settings enabled, far better at showing me what I want?
I think the size of Google or Facebook's data may well be half the problem.
Search may not be generalizable.
Maybe the algorithms TikTok uses for video suggestion end up in a more fruitful design space for personalized search.
Trying their hardest to replace quality results with things that will generate ad revenue while still making the user feel like they're getting the results they wanted.
>With all the data Google and Facebook have on everyone why is Tiktok, which I'm using with an email unconnected to anything else of mine and all iPhone privacy settings enabled, far better at showing me what I want?
I checked out TikTok for half a second and noticed that it's just damn good at going, "Hey, tenebrisalietum asked to see how to hang drywall, so show them how to hang drywall". Google sorta does that, too, but as you said, they're going, "Hey, tenebrisalietum wants to see how to hang drywall, does one of our advertisers have a video about that that we can show them? Lowe's does? Cool, fuck the quality of it, let's get that money".
TikTok knows that people just want to be shown what they ask for without all the extra bullshit. FB and Google started down the path of adding bullshit for money, and they won't go back at this point.
Fwiw I tried it myself. Went to TikTok.com and a video of a girl eating corn started playing (with sound). Tapped the search button at the bottom, which took me to the "discover" page, and there is no search input to be found.
Tried the desktop site and it only lets me search accounts, not videos.
Using Google to find honest and real reviews of products, restaurants, recipes or any other similar SEO-magnet is next to impossible.
Google incentivized the world to create their ad-centric cesspool internet and young people are choosing not to participate in it.
I don’t have to pause to allow cookies before I can see the content
I don’t have to close a full screen overlay that wants me to subscribe to a newsletter
There’s a good chance the content was made by a real person
N.B. I last used TT in January, so if they have changed the search UI since then, I wouldn't be aware of it.
Even in this article, the only source of TT's amazing search engine prowess is....a Google exec. How would they even have enough TikTok data to make such an estimation? All activity happens inside the app, so it's not even like Google could ballpark it based off Chrome browser sessions or something.
If Google+ groups took off and started taking social graph into search results and used it for ranking, that might have been a game changer.
Google is incentivized to show me more pages that have ads on them rather than pages where I might find an answer and stop searching. Every click in Google is one unit of their product that I've manufactured and drop-shipped directly to their customer, so of course that leads to search results being the carrot on the stick that produces more search queries (ad impressions). When Google does show me a page in this year 2022, it was likely written by an AI writer anyway. They've just "added value" to the page by putting in ads and affiliate links.
Using GPT-3 feels like a shortcut that gets me past all of that garbage, and straight to the questionably factual text I'm looking for.
Personally, I've switched to kagi.com and results have been night and day
And with goggles you can filter whatever results you don't like.
Although the big caveat is brave still uses Bing for image search, so it sucks.
I use SearXNG, so I can have my cake and eat it too, however I can't use UI based features, which is OK so far.
(On another note, man that new verge logo, what a waste, that old triangular logo was iconic and immediately recognizable)
I usually append "stackexchange", "quora", or "reddit" when searching to get useful answers. If you dont do that, you'll get SEOd garbage.