>Obviously.
Apparently not, as you insist on only a single value in your own post.
> The number I suggested is 1) an upper limit not a lower limit
How is that related to anything? Did you consider going even faster in rain and snow?
Apparently not, as you insist on only a single value in your own post.
> The number I suggested is 1) an upper limit not a lower limit
How is that related to anything? Did you consider going even faster in rain and snow?
No comments yet.