I dare you to discuss the Hunter Biden case in the context of what it ostensibly represents: government corruption.
Your circular logic goes nowhere: the Biden laptop story is about the Biden laptop story not being told.
Again: tell me why this story should be told? What is the real substance of your concern?
If the vice president was really taking money in exchange for influence peddling to foreign oligarchs, then that is a truly staggering level of corruption.
And that report shows that Hunter Biden was a corrupt piece of shit -- nothing compelling to show that his father was for sale as suggested.
But for some reason you only care when it's about your political enemies, so I find your concern insincere at best. Shame on you for putting party before country.
And do you feel the same way about corruption when it comes to his predecessor? I'm guessing you're good with that. Because it's your team and that's ok.
Does that ring a bell? You know, the thing they made a big deal about before the election because back then Republicans supposedly cared about national security? That impacted the election.
>The garden variety corruption of Hunter Biden isn't the important story.
Oh, do tell. Then why was it so important to tell the story? Why the fuss other than to have a fuss?
What does this have to do with the FBI trying to suppress the Hunter Biden story on social media?
Because the story itself is toxic -- it exists only to insinuate that Biden Sr. is corrupt. The GOP itself investigated and could find no such thing.
This is Buttery Males v2 and if you can't see it then that's by your choice.