Such a market split indicates the framing was intentionally authoritarian and meant to provoke/intimidate political rivals.
Such a market split indicates the framing was intentionally authoritarian and meant to provoke/intimidate political rivals.
That is massively different than the pic in the article.
The speech following that brief crowd segment is the red with marines behind him — at a point where the light was on, rather than the one featured in the photo.
I think there’s a reason you deep linked rather than show the beginning: the start is exactly the dark red set shown in the photo.
I’d encourage people to watch from the beginning, where they dim the lights to get that effect:
If you're scared of the color red, IDK what to tell you.
The time I linked was random after clicking through the video to prove my memory right.
Show me a time in the video that backs up your argument.
It’s literally the start of the video, where they dim the lights to get that dark scene.
Tell me you didn’t watch your own source without telling me you didn’t watch your own source, LOL
You're just a troll.
You’re outright lying that the lighting is different: they immediately dim the lights at the start of that video to get the dark red scene.
I have some serious questions why you’re trying to get people to “ignore their lying eyes” and dismissing people who are pointing out that photo matches the scene intentionally created at the start of the video as trolls.
I don’t find that genuine.
Strange that they’re now trying to make law enforcement misconduct the new “economic anxiety.”
90% of the video is not sinister-looking.