Did anyone ever think we'd see the day where we were using DMCA as an example of the preferrable alternative?
You can read about the various portions of it on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Ac...
Title I includes the anti-circumvention measures, which is what everyone loves to hate, but the act as a whole deals with a lot of other stuff. (Title V deals with copyright and boat hull designs, for instance!)
[1]Or something stronger, tis not like it was perfect!
The current copyright regime is tolerable. Tolerable and good are worlds apart.
The DMCA did not create copyright law, it modified it, and pre-DMCA, YouTube would have had no protections.
Imagine search engine results that consisted only of URL's.
Big media has scary pull in D.C.