The question isn't whether he's worse off or not. I don't know why you're moving the goalposts. It seems obvious that if you are presented with only two choices, one between $3 an hour and one between $0 and hour, that $3 an hour is better. The post is about whether they are being taken advantage of.
> Do you not understand that if some services are too expensive they will not exist?
No please explain more to me about how the fundamentals of economics and business work.