>The largely 2-1 ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
And at the end:
>(This story corrects to largely 2-1 ruling in second paragraph)
I don't understand this. What does "largely" mean here? Was it a 2-1 decision or not? Why the qualifier?
Each judge wrote their own opinion. You can see the first two judges are in agreement, the last writes, “ I concur with the judgment in Part IV of the majority’s opinion. I respectfully dissent from the remainder.” So they were 2-1, except for part IV, where they were 3-0. (I am confused about this part as I’ve read each section IV several times and it seems like they disagree here, one side arguing that the platforms are, and they other that they are not, entitled to pre enforcement relief. But IANAL.)