But why did Microsoft allowed Taboola in the first place despite Taboola's reputation? That's a question that I want to know the answer to.
But why did Microsoft allowed Taboola in the first place despite Taboola's reputation? That's a question that I want to know the answer to.
Are Microsoft really so hurt for cash they're willing to sacrifice their userbase for a few bucks? It seems crazy they'd stake their reputation like this, especially considering their corporate focus.
American here. What’s the beef with Klarna?
It's a scam scheme for financially illiterate people IMO. The fact that it's added into a default browser in a most popular OS in the world adds insult to the injury.
I've even been overdue on a bill (I forgot about it) and they just sent me an email asking to pay, still no fees.
Of course if I had continued to neglect the bill, fees might have started kicking in at some point, but that's no different from any other postpaid service.
If I'm reading this right, the late payment fee is maximum of $7 for their 4 payment thing?
https://cdn.klarna.com/1.0/shared/content/legal/terms/0/en_u...
If you bounce a check or an ACH the fee seems to be $27 (but not more than you owe) for their 30 day plan: https://cdn.klarna.com/1.0/shared/content/legal/terms/0/en_u...
Their pay over time thing seems to be 0-29.99% which seems in line with credit cards?
I mean, sure, I guess making it easy for people who make bad financial choices isn't great... but it's also easy for people who are making good financial choices.
Microsoft isn't, but somewhere within Microsoft there is probably team who's KPI for the year is "increase Edge ad revenue by $N million". This team is completely removed from the "make Edge a great browser" team.
Is there even a single corporation on earth that won't eventually do this? All it takes for this to happen is some executive or manager deciding they want a bonus. Shareholders demand perpetual growth and by god they're gonna deliver it.
I'd say it should be illegal to profitably harm people like this but everybody knows these people always get away with everything anyway. They already break existing laws and get a slap on the wrist at best.
About 95% of the ads were Taboola / Outbrain garbage designed to lead senior citizens into scams. Usually the ads are framed like they're stories from a news site. Secrets your doctor doesn't want you to know, (D or R) politicians just signed a bill that will let you save money refinancing your mortgage, your computer might have virus!!!!!1!
All these ads are there to prey on vulnerable people. I don't know how Microsoft, Taboola, Outbrain, etc. get away with it.
The fact that companies the size of Microsoft and Google refuse to properly sanitize their platforms is, just, gross behaviour begging for regulation.
It obviously costs them less in lobbying than it would to properly vet the ads they show.
Here's an example of Google advertising a scam: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-21/scammers-using-text-m...
So, either Taboola's dump truck had more than 10 billion dollars in it, or whomever made this call is an idiot, and the management above them is asleep at the wheel (seems like occam's answer here), or I'm missing something.
Is that really so obvious? Granted, I just use Windows and no other Microsoft products, but the way they are treating Windows, it does not seem to me that they actually care about their brand, they care about maximizing profits, since they have been introducing more and more ads into their OS.
The people who made this decision are only answerable to their team and hitting their targets. They don't care about the effects it has on other parts of the company, and don't have incentives to either.
I think there's a decent number of people working on Edge that want it to be a success, but Microsoft's "put more ads in it department" clearly gets the final say on all decisions.
Thing is, despite some particularly bad UI decisions of late, the base OS seems pretty solid these days. But then they slap this annoying UI on the top of it, and now with malware. It's like the company, as an individual, just can't help itself. Scorpions, frogs, and a river crossing, or summat.
This is about poor design and unethical decisions. MS can keep its values to itself.
> in the positive “I thought Microsoft would be better than this” way seems likely to have the most effect if enough people do it.
But how many is enough? And whom do I approach with this "positive" feedback so that the feedback is not routed to /dev/null? I'm pretty sure that MS receives a ton of feedback on this and similar topics and ignores it.
This is ridiculous. People hate how Edge is bloated nowadays and it’s a fact. You know it, we know it. But MS does nothing to fix that. Instead it pushes forward and adds new shit into the web browser.
* What's "Microsoft Rewards" in MS Edge? An award for those users who share the most amount of telemetry with MS?
* And a "Math solver" in a web browser?
* Games menu?
* FOUR unskippable screens to opt out of some useless features?
All this needs to be in a web browser?
Oh and I almost forgot. Please add support for Flash games into the web browser, add BonziBuddy and bring back my favourite AOL toolbar from IE. I'm missing all this (no).
MS's only job was to create a fast and clean Chromium-based web browser. It failed again.
My suggestion is that when it fails at a job you care about, instead of dismissing the company as a whole you raise the gap between that particular bit of execution and the espoused values of the company.
That’s how I would raise it internally, because it respects the job people are doing while also suggesting a path for improvement.