Do you have any evidence for the claim that RCV was introduced in Alaska for the purpose of bringing a Democrat to the to power?
But if a heavy blue state elected a red governor (especially with a popular blue opponent) out of nowhere immediately after switching to a new voting system people here would be suspicious right?
But because it happens that blue candidates are winning in areas they weren't before, everyone here is fine looking the other way and even defending it.
It was a ballot initiative that passed by will of the people. Who are you to argue about their decision?
It's their choice, but it's a stupid choice. Personally it seems they were naive or even lied to about the outcome.
I can argue their decision because of the 1A. Same as you can argue against their previous system...