[1] http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20080338-264/firefox-world...
Nope.
> I thought it was just a very popular third-party addon?
Yep.
In addition to supporting Firebug, we're also experimenting with alternative developer tools.
It's my belief that most developer tools just present the user with the information that was given to the browser in the first place, and that we can do a lot to explain how the browser actually understands all that stuff. The native developer tools are a step in that direction.
I work on Mozilla developer tools.
Sure, Mozilla supports the development of Firebug, but as far as I know it does not make Firebug classified as "a Mozilla project", it's a (very popular) third-party project with support from the Mozilla foundation is it not?
13 Jan Honza Odvarko 2011-11-09 06:03:27 PST
...
(given that I am the only one maintaining the entire Firebug project now).
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699528#c13I am also a member of the Mozilla dev-tools team and one of the Firebug's goals in the future is to reuse Firefox built-in tools and components. This way, we can reduce amount of work on Firebug side and also make sure that APIs of these built-in tools are well designed.
So, Firebug would still be a Firefox extension, but built on top of much better APIs, adding advanced features (e.g. those that are not suitable to be natively in Firefox).
It's also an advantage for other dev-tools that can appear (as Firefox extensions) - especially for those that integrate with Firebug.
Honza