You reveal that you never had any intention of engaging honestly.
This is the very first line from the very first post in the thread:
>> It’s hard, if not impossible, to avoid use-after-frees in a non-trivial codebase.
This is the very first line from the very first post in the thread:
>> It’s hard, if not impossible, to avoid use-after-frees in a non-trivial codebase.
I just provided thousands of examples where it is true. To offset all that evidence can you provide, say, millions of examples where zero (your phrase) use-after-free bugs have been found?
>You reveal that you never had any intention of engaging honestly.
Honest engaging would be for you to provide evidence for a claim you made when asked. I provided extremely solid counter evidence from the result of many, many research teams.
So, care to honestly engage about your claim?