Have you read the judgement? ROFL

They justify the verdict on abusive monopolies through a maze of findings that involve the actual letter of the law not being flouted but agreeing with the commissions convoluted approach of discretionary parsing of the devices sold in a 10 year period and associated success or failure of other competitors that Google has zero control over and which may have been caused by a billion other factors.

Must be fun defending a judgement you haven't read with the exact reason the comment you responded to is pissed at highlighted so nicely in your third paragraph.