Not ready for prime-time. Not even close. I wonder if they ever tested their query engine, it's hardly useful. No quotes? Queries ignore important characters like "_"? No roll-up of identical results? It also misses methods in its "(num) methods" results (or throws them into a totally different order) in several languages, and has some crazy match-ordering behavior.

An example: I searched for "helper_method" (a Rails method), and found these (bracketed what was bolded as the search hits):

  class.Scheduler.php:
  // Holds [method]s for ...
  Editor.py:
  from Models import Editor[Helper], Controllers
  AutShare.h:
  // IShare [method]s

and then I get over a dozen literally-identical files called "helper_method_example.rb" (tests with these results:

  require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/spec_[helper]'
  
  describe "a context with [helper] a [method]" do
    def [helper_method]
  
  and the rest of the files contained this after those lines:
      "received call"
    end
    
    it "should make that method available to specs" do
      helper_method.should == "received call"
    end
  end

There are about three pages of results like that, or the same wrapped in a `module HelperMethodExample`, with identical contents otherwise.